Name:     ID: 
 
Email: 

Business Law Chapter 3.2 Worksheet

True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
 

 1. 

Contributory negligence is recognized in all 50 states.
 

 2. 

If you voluntarily participate in a dangerous activity, knowing the risks, and get harmed you generally can’t sue for injuries.
 

 3. 

Proximate cause simply means that the negligent party was in the same proximity of the party that was injured.
 

 4. 

Negligence is the accidental tort that occurs most often.
 

 5. 

In order to be found negligent it must be proved that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care.
 

 6. 

If the plaintiff is proven to have been more than 50 percent responsible for the damages the plaintiff can still collect compensation.
 

 7. 

If you keep a dangerous animal as a pet you will be liable for any injury caused by that animal even if it isn’t your fault.
 

 8. 

If a person is the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit and they die the lawsuit is ended.
 

 9. 

If a car salesman takes a boat in on trade and then sells the boat and it is later found to be defective the salesman is guilty of product liability.
 

 10. 

A business can be sued for product liability only if they manufacturer the defective item.
 

Multiple Choice
Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
 

 11. 

Paul got in a taxi at LAX and asked the driver to take him to the Hilton.  After a few blocks it was apparent to Paul that the driver was intoxicated.  However, before Paul could get the driver to stop they were hit by a streetsweeper.  Paul received extensive injuries because of the accident.  Paul could sue for negligence because the driver failed to provided
a.
reasonable conveyance
c.
objectivity
b.
duty of care
d.
personal responsibility
 

 12. 

In order to prove negligence you must prove all of the following except
a.
duty of care
c.
contractual acceptance
b.
breached duty of care
d.
proximate cause
 

 13. 

According to the reasonable person test you have to be
a.
considerate to others
c.
negligence beyond a reasonable doubt
b.
responsible for your actions
d.
as careful as a reasonable person in the same situation
 

 14. 

Lexi was on vacation and decided to parasail even though she was aware that it was dangerous.  While in the air Lexi was hit by a whooping crane and injured badly.  Lexi attempted to sue the whooping crane, the boat driver and the boat owner.  She could not prevail because she
a.
had assumed the risk
c.
the whooping crane died
b.
could not prove duty of care
d.
had not signed a contract
 

 15. 

Gina and her buddies went ice fishing on Lake Madison.  While in Rachel’s icehouse they got cold and started a bonfire.  The ice quickly melted and Gina and her buddies all fell into the water but were quickly rescued by some volunteer firemen responding to the smoke and thankfully no one was harmed.  Gina sued Rachel but was not successful because she
a.
could not prove who started the fire
c.
was not harmed
b.
was guilty of contributory negligence
d.
assumed the risk
 

 16. 

Jesse, Badger and Skinny Pete were out for a drive when Badger started feeling ill.  Badger asked to be left at the nearest gas station and said he would call his Mom to come and pick him up.  While waiting at the gas station Badger was struck by lighting and killed.  Badger’s Mom had no case against Jesse because she could not prove
a.
that Jesse was the proximate cause for Badger’s injury
c.
that Jesse was aware of the lighting storm
b.
that Jesse owed a duty of care to Badger
d.
that Skinny Pete wanted to sit in the front seat
 

 17. 

Gustavo works in a dynamite factory.  He sometimes forgets to check his pockets at the end of the work day and has accidentally brought home three dozen sticks dynamite in the last two months.  The dynamite is stored in a safe, dry spot in his basement.  One day while Gustavo is at work Agent Schrader serves a search warrant on his house.  In the process of searching the house Agent Schrader kicks the dynamite setting off a massive explosion.  Agent Schrader’s wife could successfully sue Gustavo because  
a.
Gustavo took the dynamite out of the factory against company rules
c.
because of product liability
b.
of strict liability
d.
of neglect
 

 18. 

Crazy Karl is a logger and the company that he works for is struggling financially.  Because of their financial situation the company has not replaced worn out safety equipment.  Crazy Carl is up topping a 150 tree and his safety belt breaks and unfortunately he falls to his death.  Mrs. Karl is able to sue the tree company because of 
a.
wrongful death statues
c.
proximate cause statues
b.
strict liability statutes
d.
assumption of risk statutes
 

 19. 

Stella Liebeck was successful in her lawsuit because she was able to prove
a.
that strict liability meant it didn’t matter who was at fault when she was injured.
c.
that survival statutes made the a suit viable
b.
that she wasn’t negligent consuming the beverage
d.
that the restaurant acted in a reasonable manner.
 

 20. 

While Kirby was driving south on the highway he was talking on his phone and eating some chicken nuggets.  At the same time Lisa was driving north on the same highway putting on some makeup and chain smoking.  Alternate matter cannot coexist in the same space so a collision occurred.  Lisa was unsuccessful in her lawsuit against Kirby because
a.
of comparative negligence
c.
she could not prove proximate cause
b.
of assumption of risk in driving a car
d.
she was driving on an expired drivers license
 

 21. 

Kylie was concerned about living on her own in the city so she bought herself a guard dog named Cujo.  Cujo is very good at his job of protecting Kylie and their home.  Kylie forgot her lunch at home so she calls her friend Enrique and asks him to stop by her home and to pick up her lunch forgetting about Cujo.  Unfortunately for Enrique he becomes lunch.  Kylie could be sued for negligence because she
a.
forgot to mention Cujo to Enrique
c.
forgot her lunch
b.
breached her duty of care to Enrique
d.
didn’t license Cujo with the city
 

Matching
 
 
a.
Negligence
f.
Strict Liability
b.
Proximate Cause
g.
Reasonable
c.
Contributory Negligence
h.
Objective
d.
Comparative Negligence
i.
Foreseeable
e.
Assumption of Risk
 

 22. 

When someone knows the risk involved and still takes the chance of being injured
 

 23. 

Moderate, fair and rational
 

 24. 

When the defendant can show that the victim did something that helped cause their own injuries
 

 25. 

Uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices
 

 26. 

Some activities are so dangerous that liability will always follow any injury from those activities
 

 27. 

When one person carelessly injures another
 

 28. 

Link between the negligent conduct and injury are recognized by the law
 

 29. 

To see or know beforehand
 

 30. 

When the carelessness of each party is compared to the carelessness of the other party
 



 
         Start Over